The same warning was also handed down by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), and the Inspector General of Police (IGP), Solomon Arase.
They told Saraki to face the charges against him, and stop imputing political motives to his trial.
The AGF and others faulted Saraki’s claim that his trial was politically motivated. In a counter affidavit they filed at the Federal High Court, Abuja, in response to a fresh suit by Saraki, they denied being influenced by any political consideration to initiate the 13-count false asset declaration charge against him (Saraki) before the CCT.
The AGF, EFCC, IGP, the Director of Public Prosecution of the Federation
(DPPF), Mohammed Diri and Muslim Hassan (a Deputy Director in the
Federal Ministry of Justice) said Saraki’s trial was informed by the
outcome of a joint investigation conducted by the EFCC, Department of
State Services (DSS), the Code of Conduct Bureau (CCB) and theICPC
between 2003 and 2015.The AGF and others faulted Saraki’s claim that his trial was politically motivated. In a counter affidavit they filed at the Federal High Court, Abuja, in response to a fresh suit by Saraki, they denied being influenced by any political consideration to initiate the 13-count false asset declaration charge against him (Saraki) before the CCT.
They said the Senate President lied in his claim that an official of the Federal Ministry of Justice, Bulus Micheal said his trial was politically motivated. They said no official of the ministry bears such name.
“The charges preferred against him before the CCT were based on the conviction that a prima facie case was disclosed after investigation and not on any political consideration. The 1st, 2nd, 4th, 10th and 11th respondents (AGF, EFCC, IGP, Diri and Hassan) are not politicians and they have no interest in who becomes the Senate President.
“The 1st, 2nd, 4th, 10th and 11th respondents do not take instructions from any politician, but are public officers and public offices, who are only interested in the performance of their statutory and constitutional duties.
“No one has made or is making any effort to trump up allegations against the applicant, but the charges that were preferred against him were preferred upon being satisfied that a prima facie case was disclosed against him”, they said.
They denied Saraki’s claims that his rights were being violated with his trial before the CCT, arguing that aside that the charges were validly preferred, the Court of Appeal, Abuja has, in its judgment of October 30, 2015 upheld the CCT’s position that it possessed the jurisdiction to try Saraki.
0 comments:
Post a Comment